- Journal
- Industry
The OTA tax is optional.
Hotels don't lose direct bookings to better marketing. They lose them to better software. That's fixable.
Watch a guest book a room. They find the property on Instagram, fall for it, open the property's own website — and then book through an OTA anyway. The property pays commission on a guest it already won. That detour, repeated thousands of times a year, is one of the largest invisible line items in hospitality.
The usual response is to spend more on marketing: loyalty discounts, "book direct" banners, retargeting. But the guest didn't leave because the marketing failed. They left because the OTA's booking path was simply better software than the property's.
It's in the booking path
The brand that cost millions to build evaporates somewhere around the third screen of the booking engine — the moment the property site hands off to an iframe with someone else's typography and a loading spinner. Slow pages, clumsy date pickers, rates that don't match the ad: each one is a quiet argument for going back to the OTA tab.
None of this is a marketing problem. It's a design problem, and design problems have design solutions: a booking path that stays on brand to the last click, loads in under a second anywhere on earth, and lets the revenue team change an offer at 11 p.m. without filing a ticket.
“Nobody books through the OTA because they love it. They book there because it's easier. Easier is a thing you can build.”
What happens when you fix it
A resort group we work with has grown direct bookings nine-fold on a platform built this way — revenue that used to route through the OTAs, now landing where it belongs. The mechanics weren't magic: sub-second pages, a booking flow that looks like the property, and a marketing team that can publish offers the day they're conceived.
The OTAs are fine businesses. They're just optional ones, at the margin where most properties actually compete. More on how we build for this is on the hotels page.
